The little season theory is now gathering more steam and being heavily promoted by shills – it is the final boss of false doctrine before you realise the truth, that Revelation has long been fulfilled.
Just like the liars who preach that the second coming of Jesus Christ is yet future, the little season theory completely demobilises believers. It has you waiting for an imminent ending that will never arrive.
Every influencer trying to convince you that we are currently in the little season of Satan of Revelation chapter 20 is in my opinion an invert deceiver. They include My Lunch Break, Understanding Conspiracy, Jason Jack, JT follows JC, Leaving Babylon and many other YouTube channels, Facebook groups and authors like Allan Cornford.
With Eddie Bravo, one of the most obvious fake truthers, now promoting the little season theory, those who are actually born again should know it’s a deception.
I am not saying these controlled op fake truthers are not showing some truth; they will always give you a spoonful of sugar to help the poison go down.
You can usually see the men are inverts just by looking at their skull shape, jaws and sloping down shoulders, even if you can’t see the gait. From my investigations, all inverts promote deception, even (especially) if they appear to be wholesome Christians.
My Lunch Break will sometimes make passing references in his videos to the little season as bait for Christians, but while he will flog all sorts of snake oil in his ads, he will never promote the gospel of Jesus Christ. No one sponsored by the invert FE Dave (who was recently out in force defending The Final Experiment hoax) passes the sniff test for me.
Satan was always under God’s control, look at the book of Job for instance. After Jesus has already won, why would God give Satan free rein to terrorise God’s people for hundreds of years? The little season was only a short time as the name implies.
Satan is little more than a caricature today, and an easy stand-in to take the blame for the deception currently perpetrated by inverts in secret societies.
Satan is already in the lake of fire and if you look at the satanism that is deliberately put in front of our face today with a critical eye, you can see that it is largely fake theatre promoted by inverts.
Isn’t it obvious that if Satan is in the lake of fire, the shills will do everything to convince you he’s not? Why do you think the celebrities are so overt with the public displays of satanism such as at the Grammy Awards?
Naive people will say isn’t it obvious Satan is still around, when they are just following the breadcrumbs on the television that are deliberately left to deceive them.
Jason Jack (two first names) is particularly egregious in the way he will twist scripture to fit his false doctrine. I’ve tried numerous times to correct him.
Why little season theory is wrong
I used to believe the little season theory – the key for me was realising that new earth in scripture is not a whole new creation, and the end of the world was the day of the Lord.
The “little season” of Satan in scripture (Revelation 20) was only short – to try to stretch it to hundreds of years now and counting is a complete perversion of scripture.
Just look up all other references in the KJV to “little season” (e.g. Revelation 6:9-11) and “long season” (e.g. Luke 23:8 and Joshua 24:7) and you’ll see a little season cannot be hundreds of years.
The little season of Satan was only a short time and for a specific purpose which is laid out in scripture. Only those in the little season who went up against the camp of the saints were destroyed by fire coming down from heaven, not the entire world.
Jason Jack says there will be another resurrection, another return of Jesus, and an entire new earth at the end of the little season of Satan. There is no scripture to support this.
In this way the little season theory is no different to dispensationalism as it completely pacifies you, and has you waiting for an imminent return of Jesus that will always be on the cusp, but will never arrive.
There is only one second coming in scripture, one new Jerusalem, and the resurrections have already taken place.
The first resurrection in scripture occurred at the second coming of Christ, and the second resurrection was after the 1000 year millennial reign, as per Revelation. Therefore Jason Jack claiming there is another return of Jesus, and another resurrection, is completely adding on to scripture.
The day of the Lord aka Armageddon aka the second coming of Christ was the end of the world, when heaven and earth passed away. This is clearly said in 2 Peter 3, so it is false to argue heaven and earth passes away after the little season.
New earth is not an entirely new creation as per 2 Peter 3, and scripture clearly says that the earth abides forever (e.g. Ecclesiastes 1:4).
The apostles undoubtedly said they were living at the end of the world, in the last days. (e.g. 1 Corinthians 10:11, 1 Peter 1:20, 1 Peter 4:7, Hebrews 1:2, Hebrews 8:13, Acts 2:15-17, 1 John 2:18).
Jesus returned to the same generation as per scripture, the world was destroyed by fire in the fervent heat event, then there was the 1000 year millennial reign of Christ followed by the short season of Satan.
Jason Jack claims Jerusalem and the Roman Empire were destroyed at the same time but we can see from Jesus words in Luke that Jesus only came in the clouds after Jerusalem was destroyed. The fervent heat event on the day of the Lord caused worldwide destruction as we can see from the study of “meltology”.
Revelation says those who went up against the camp of the saints during the little season were destroyed, but otherwise the world continued on. Revelation is a series of visions, and its structure has allowed some to deceptively claim that the new earth only comes after the little season rather than after the day of the Lord.
Man has always had a choice of whether to serve God or not, but there was more strict control during the 1000 year millennial reign by the saints who reigned as kings and priests during that time as promised by God.
In Revelation and Isaiah we can clearly see that the promises of the good things on the new earth and the habitation of God’s people are inside new Jerusalem and Mount Zion.
Scripture is clear that liars and abominations and death still exists outside of new Jerusalem (see the end chapters of Revelation). Only inside new Jerusalem can you eat from the tree of life and live forever.
The last thing Jesus tells us to do in Revelation is to come to new Jerusalem. Those who are born again have already secured victory through Jesus Christ. We can make the pilgrimage to Mount Zion any time.
We can all hopefully agree that Jerusalem was destroyed as prophesied in the gospels by Jesus.
New Jerusalem came down at the start of the millennial reign and has been there ever since.
Jason Jack argues Jerusalem was destroyed around 70-76AD but has still not been rebuilt including for the 1000 year millennial reign and beyond. If that’s the case then how could people worship God at Mount Zion during the millennial reign?
After I began showing clear proof that the real Jerusalem is located around the North Pole, Jason Jack started saying in his videos that it was there in the past but has moved because of Armageddon.
Jason Jack says in multiple videos he thinks Jerusalem could have been split up between multiple cities now after Armageddon events (such as New York, London and Rome or Paris). His position is completely nonsensical – Mount Zion does not just move (Psalm 125:1).
The reason they have to confuse you about the true location of biblical Jerusalem should be obvious, they don’t want you to know that prophecy has been fulfilled.
If the little season shills were genuine they’d be trying hard to find the camp of the saints, but aside from a deliberately half-hearted attempt by Toadhouse Homestead (who since deleted most of their videos), they barely even talk about it.
The little season shills don’t even want you trying to find the camp of the saints because they know that New Jerusalem is already at magnetic north.
Why preterism is wrong
The little season shills will try to smear my view that Revelation has been fulfilled, as being “full preterism”. This is a lie, as preterists believe that the entire Revelation was fulfilled at the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, and that the 1000 year millennial reign was not a literal 1000 years (which is false).
Preterists are wrong because, as Jesus said in Luke, he only returned in the clouds after Jerusalem was already destroyed, and the destruction on the day of the Lord was worldwide it was not confined to Jerusalem (as “meltology” shows).
Preterists try to spiritualise everything such as the 1000 year millennial reign (which we know was a literal 1000 years because it says it six times in the same chapter of Revelation), as well as the New Jerusalem. They still accept the secular history narrative, which is false.
I am saying that according to scripture, Revelation has been fulfilled, the 1000 years was actually 1000 years, and new Jerusalem is physically on this earth for us to go to now. The great white throne judgment occurred at the second coming of Christ, which was also the end of the world, when heaven and earth passed away.
New Jerusalem physically came down from heaven as stated twice in Revelation, after the previous Jerusalem was destroyed per the prophecy made by Jesus in the gospels.
What about the Statue of Liberty?
Some believe the Statue of Liberty is a depiction of the release of Satan and that 1776 was the start of the little season. But it’s obvious that we were not in the millennial reign right before 1776 (and Revelation may have been fulfilled for some time now).
We don’t know what Satan really looked like, but the statue does appear similar to the painting of Satan that was allegedly made in the 1700s. We can’t confirm which came first the painting or the statue.
The Statue of Liberty looks very similar to the Roman/Greek false gods such as Apollo, Helios, Libertas, Minerva etc.
It could have been there for a very long time, we don’t really know when the statue was built. The base of the structure as well as the dodgy construction photos makes me believe it was not built during our time period.
Even if the Statue of Liberty is a depiction of Satan, it would not change the fact that scripture clearly shows Revelation has been fulfilled, as I have shown.
For a further dismantling of the little season theory and a deeper dive into the scriptures, please see my earlier post titled, We are not in Satan’s little season.